Hopefully we will be able to organise a trip to Te Radars show: Eating the Dog
I saw it last year and it is brilliant. Hopefully we will be able to organise a trip to the show on Saturday 24th September at Downstage
Friday, 16 September 2011
Friday, 9 September 2011
Examinations
One of my students tells me his mates at MAGS in Auckland have found this site useful! Glad to hear it boys(and girls). Mister Bean is old but still entertaining. Enjoy. There are some useful Exam links below.
On Reading the Instructions!
Have you been to NZQA and checked out the old exams and exemplars OR the Exam Reports and Marking Schedules?
Mr Bean on Being Prepared.
Mr Bean on Being Prepared.
Thursday, 25 August 2011
The green green grass of home....
...apologies to Tom Jones...
As we discussed in class Pastoralism is the farming of pasture (aka grass). In New Zealand this has traditionally been in conjunction with either sheep or cattle.
Before 1882 pastoralism was associated with sheep (and mainly Merino) and the wool they produced. In farming terms this is called extensive sheep farming. The farms are large and a long way from town. The farms had their own name, 'stations' or 'runs' borrowed from their equivalent in Australia and most likely carried across with the earliest sheep farmers who came over to the South Island in the 1850's.
This was the also the origin of the term "Cockie" for farmer (Borrowed from Ockers where the Cockatiels that infested farmland especially at harvest time). This period from the 1850's was the 'wool period' when the imported Merino sheep ruled the tussock lands of the South Island, and the flat lands of the Wairarapa and Hawkes Bay. This period saw the creation of vast estates especially in the South Island.
The voyage of the 'Dunedin' in 1882 is accorded little real significance in our history certainly less than it deserves, and yet it is the watershed/tipping point in our history.Only one carcass was rejected at the end of that first voyage, and reports were very favourable. So successful was this venture that British farmers demanded that shipments be labelled as 'New Zealand Mutton'. Initially we sent only Merino and mainly mutton, but quickly adapted to British demand for lamb. This worked both ways, the British got tastier meat in small (oven size) portions, we got to send more carcasses which were worth more.
We also changed the breeds of sheep, Merino remained on some Runs producing high quality wool, while Corriedale and other breeds were producing a mix of wool and meat. In 1882 we sent 35,000 carcasses, by 1900 it was 3.5m per annum.
Butter and Cheese suddenly joined the export list. It also allowed farming to expand in the North Island. Taranaki and the Waikato especially became viable. Chew Chong established the first cooperative and suddenly Dairy Co-ops sprang up everywhere. Farmers pooled their money to establish the factory, supplied the milk and cut down Kahikatiha to box up the product.
Exporting exploded to feed the insatiable British demand. Of course Belich has considered the 1880's a period when New Zealand which had begun to spread its wings was suddenly dragged back under Britains aprons strings to become her garden albeit one that was 12,000 miles away.
The downstream effect of refrigeration lay in the new industry surrounding the killing and processing of the meat. Refrigeration led to Railways to ship the meat and Cool stores to keep the meat, under the Vogels schemes, road and rail became a necessity to transport the meat to port where it was stored. While the main trunk line connected the main centers, branch-line's were used to connect the hinterland to the ports.
As we discussed in class Pastoralism is the farming of pasture (aka grass). In New Zealand this has traditionally been in conjunction with either sheep or cattle.
Before 1882 pastoralism was associated with sheep (and mainly Merino) and the wool they produced. In farming terms this is called extensive sheep farming. The farms are large and a long way from town. The farms had their own name, 'stations' or 'runs' borrowed from their equivalent in Australia and most likely carried across with the earliest sheep farmers who came over to the South Island in the 1850's.
This was the also the origin of the term "Cockie" for farmer (Borrowed from Ockers where the Cockatiels that infested farmland especially at harvest time). This period from the 1850's was the 'wool period' when the imported Merino sheep ruled the tussock lands of the South Island, and the flat lands of the Wairarapa and Hawkes Bay. This period saw the creation of vast estates especially in the South Island.
Using the Australian model it was a simple matter of claiming land with the Provincial Government and lease-holding the land, often with the view of making it freehold as quickly as possible. Although as we will discover they did not always own all of the land they controlled. The key was liquidity and the creation of huge flocks of sheep. New Zealand's climate provided warm weather and plentiful rain, which meant plenty of grass, a few ewes and a ram did the rest. Samuel Butler doubled his money in only a few years before retiring home to GB to write his book "Erewhon" based on his experiences at his station "Mesopotamia".
The Stations needed large pools of labour, especially at shearing time. Itinerant shearing gangs travelled with the season southward (the season started in the north) to stations as they were needed. Wool could then be stored and transported to port for shipping to Britain. Wool developed a new market in coastal transportation. All of this activity created vast wealth for a favoured few and left a bitter taste in the mouths of many migrants who found land difficult to acquire in the 1870's. In the south this wealth tended to dominate local and later national politics. In 1882 this all changed.
REFRIGERATION. (1882...)
The wool period was responsible for opening up large areas of the South Island and created a new class of land owners. By the end of the 1860's most of the South Island was owned by a relatively small number of families. The Sheep stations were enormous with tens of thousands of sheep supplying vast quantities of wool, but relatively little meat. It turns out Merino meat is not very tasty. (fishy apparently?) Apart from areas of the Wairarapa and the Hawkes Bay sheep farming made little impact in the North island, due in part to the less suitable heavily forested land and the reluctance of Maori to sell their land.
The confiscations and the Land Court would in the main remove the Maori from this equation, but the forest would slow down any development. By the 1870's the growth in Britain's population and its increased earning power created a demand for better quality food from around the world, increasingly they demanded meat - fresh or frozen. Argentina had already sent shipments across the Atlantic with some success. Australia sent its first shipment in 1871, giving sheep breeders in New Zealand hope that they to could establish a new industry. The work of a few enthusiastic and entrepreneurial Otago runholders saw the first shipment of sheep meat sent to Britain in 1882.
The Stations needed large pools of labour, especially at shearing time. Itinerant shearing gangs travelled with the season southward (the season started in the north) to stations as they were needed. Wool could then be stored and transported to port for shipping to Britain. Wool developed a new market in coastal transportation. All of this activity created vast wealth for a favoured few and left a bitter taste in the mouths of many migrants who found land difficult to acquire in the 1870's. In the south this wealth tended to dominate local and later national politics. In 1882 this all changed.
REFRIGERATION. (1882...)
The wool period was responsible for opening up large areas of the South Island and created a new class of land owners. By the end of the 1860's most of the South Island was owned by a relatively small number of families. The Sheep stations were enormous with tens of thousands of sheep supplying vast quantities of wool, but relatively little meat. It turns out Merino meat is not very tasty. (fishy apparently?) Apart from areas of the Wairarapa and the Hawkes Bay sheep farming made little impact in the North island, due in part to the less suitable heavily forested land and the reluctance of Maori to sell their land.
The confiscations and the Land Court would in the main remove the Maori from this equation, but the forest would slow down any development. By the 1870's the growth in Britain's population and its increased earning power created a demand for better quality food from around the world, increasingly they demanded meat - fresh or frozen. Argentina had already sent shipments across the Atlantic with some success. Australia sent its first shipment in 1871, giving sheep breeders in New Zealand hope that they to could establish a new industry. The work of a few enthusiastic and entrepreneurial Otago runholders saw the first shipment of sheep meat sent to Britain in 1882.
The voyage of the 'Dunedin' in 1882 is accorded little real significance in our history certainly less than it deserves, and yet it is the watershed/tipping point in our history.Only one carcass was rejected at the end of that first voyage, and reports were very favourable. So successful was this venture that British farmers demanded that shipments be labelled as 'New Zealand Mutton'. Initially we sent only Merino and mainly mutton, but quickly adapted to British demand for lamb. This worked both ways, the British got tastier meat in small (oven size) portions, we got to send more carcasses which were worth more.
We also changed the breeds of sheep, Merino remained on some Runs producing high quality wool, while Corriedale and other breeds were producing a mix of wool and meat. In 1882 we sent 35,000 carcasses, by 1900 it was 3.5m per annum.
Butter and Cheese suddenly joined the export list. It also allowed farming to expand in the North Island. Taranaki and the Waikato especially became viable. Chew Chong established the first cooperative and suddenly Dairy Co-ops sprang up everywhere. Farmers pooled their money to establish the factory, supplied the milk and cut down Kahikatiha to box up the product.
Exporting exploded to feed the insatiable British demand. Of course Belich has considered the 1880's a period when New Zealand which had begun to spread its wings was suddenly dragged back under Britains aprons strings to become her garden albeit one that was 12,000 miles away.
The downstream effect of refrigeration lay in the new industry surrounding the killing and processing of the meat. Refrigeration led to Railways to ship the meat and Cool stores to keep the meat, under the Vogels schemes, road and rail became a necessity to transport the meat to port where it was stored. While the main trunk line connected the main centers, branch-line's were used to connect the hinterland to the ports.
In many respects refrigeration created a new demand for land, but land was still hard to find. However the 'Long Depression' which arrived in 1879 with the collapse of the Bank of Glasgow had already begun to impact with many of the stations falling into financial hardship. The new exports helped but many were to over stretched and became bankrupt. It would take the Liberals to free up land for the 'little' man.
The Colour of Money: Gold Fever
During the 19th Century gold held an incredible hold over the imaginations of people. For many it was a quick route to wealth. As a result there were massive gold rushes in various parts of the world. The first was to California in 1848, the prospectors who took part were called ‘49er’s… This was followed by the Victorian rush in the 1850’s and the Eureka Stockade insurrection that followed.
The economies of these areas grew enormously. The huge numbers of prospectors and the services they demanded created a lot of wealth (little of which actually came from finding gold). Melbourne grew from a small settlement of about 30,000 to a million i about 50 years. Gold was a quick and easy route to local, regional and national prosperity. Although the Gold was not expected to last it would provide a major kickstart to a regions economic growth, hopefully pushing it beyond the tipping point where the growth would continue....
As a result the provincial Governments were desperate to find gold somewhere within their regions. Several offered rewards to anyone who could find it. New Zealand appeared to have the geology (although that was a relatively new science) so it simply appeared to be a matter of finding it. Early discoveries of ‘colour’ were made in Nelson and the Coromandel but were unworkable.
Eventually as you know an Australian Gabriel Read discovered gold in Otago in May 1861 and the rush was on. The province exploded, prospectors arrived from all around the world, but especially from Victoria. Many were keen to escape the taxation and corruption of the Australian fields. In Otago they were taxed less and received larger claims to boot.
This was alluvial gold, which could initially be easily found by individuals. Later small groups or collectives formed to extract the gold from the riverbanks.
Eventually gold was also found in the West Coast, Nelson and again in the Coromandel. When news of the discovery on the Coromandel arrived in Auckland, the male population of the city disappeared overnight, emptying stores of pans, shovels and food. Many were disappointed to find the gold locked away in the rock.
These later discoveries were quartz based gold, which required even larger amounts of money, the days of the lone prospector were numbered. Companies formed in Christchurch, Wellington or Auckland were formed to buy the equipment needed to extract the rock and crush it. This needed water or steam power, and the giant stampers which kept Grahamstown (Thames) awake 6 days a week.
Gold remained an important export commodity for much of the century. Its importance lay in the changes it made to the physical and social fabric of New Zealand. Much of the South Island was now settled with towns spread from north to south and east to west.
Much of the island had been explored and for a time Dunedin was the country’s largest city. South island run-holders were able to expand as the population gave them a market for their meat. The miners also brought with them a belief in equality and the early ideas of mateship that were also developing in the bush frontier settlements of the north. This was especially strong on the West Coast where large numbers of Irish established themselves along with their Catholic beliefs.
In terms of importance Gold was a major export for the country through the remainder of the century. It brought tens of thousands of migrants to most of the South Island opening up areas that had previously been empty. It reinvigorated a slumping pastoral industry and created an infrastructure to support itself and affiliated industries. It helped to fund the wars in the North which in turn created a call for secession between the Islands.
Much of the island had been explored and for a time Dunedin was the country’s largest city. South island run-holders were able to expand as the population gave them a market for their meat. The miners also brought with them a belief in equality and the early ideas of mateship that were also developing in the bush frontier settlements of the north. This was especially strong on the West Coast where large numbers of Irish established themselves along with their Catholic beliefs.
In terms of importance Gold was a major export for the country through the remainder of the century. It brought tens of thousands of migrants to most of the South Island opening up areas that had previously been empty. It reinvigorated a slumping pastoral industry and created an infrastructure to support itself and affiliated industries. It helped to fund the wars in the North which in turn created a call for secession between the Islands.
The Bush Frontier - Timber
The early exploiters of resources like timber have been described by Belich as "Tasmen" a way of explaining the importance of Australia in our early industrial development. Like other forms of exploitation it was based mainly on the coastline with a high level of interaction with local Maori.. Hokianga provided a safe Harbour with an abundance of readily available timber and cooperative Maori (Ngapuhi). It should be remembered that the captain of the Boyd was lured into a trap by the promise of timber...
In terms of significance - by 1840 a third of the 2000 Europeans in New Zealand were actively involved in the timber trade.
Early timber trade centers in the north. Its based mainly around the north and especially the Hokianga. Many ships called in around New Zealand to pick up timber in ad hoc arrangements but a real 'trade' developed in the Far North. It was aimed at extracting wood for ships spars and later developed into cut wood for the Sydney building trade. Kauri was the main timber felled later as building trade in Australia and Auckland - the shift to Auckland resulted in an explosion in building for the new Capital. The Bush frontier would last well into the next century.The trade created a new type of New Zealander, the Bushman. Living on the edge of the bush (and sometimes well inside it) they were almost devoid of female company resulting in the idea of 'mateship' which was also developing in Australia.
Groups of men living for long periods in close proximity and in occupations which were extremely dangerous meant that real and long lasting friendships were created.Good manners and behaviour was expected and any who failed to follow the (often unwritten) rules would not last long in the camp.
The worst that could be said of a man was that he did not pull his weight on the job or that he was a thief or a cheat (gambling and alcohol was strictly banned in most camps). Any of these failings could mean that no-one would employ a man and he would have to leave the district and hope his reputation did not follow him to his new job.Miles Fairburn has used some examples to justify his idea of transience and lack of community. Subsequent research has seriously challenged this with many examples of 'mates' or familial groups working together for many years - sometimes for decades.
The sense of community extended to welfare, injured workers were ferried out by mates who would carry thier friend out on their shoulders or backs. If a death occurred leaving a family, the ir effects (clothes, tools etc) would be auctioned with their mates often paying well over the odds for the second-hand gear.
Timber saw the development of new technology, Pit Saws gave way to Steam and Bullocks were sometimes replaced by Bush trams (converted Traction Engines!!!)
The Timberjack was invented to assist the movemnet of the giant logs, as was the the Kauri Dam to move logs through hilly terrain, especially where the Corduroy Roads and Bullocks could not.
The Timber industry opened up new areas, assisting in the spread of farming and established many small towns in new area, especially the 70 Mile bush between Wellington and the Hawkes Bay, the Central North Island and in the Taranaki. The Sawmill that followed the workers attracted other small businesses . If the timber lasted long enough a small town could develop, sometimes it might be able to withstand the loss of the trade and continue to flourish as farming replaced the trees. ( Dannevirke or Featherston). If the timber ran out too quickly the town might not survive the loss. (Anyone remember Mauriceville?)
In terms of significance - by 1840 a third of the 2000 Europeans in New Zealand were actively involved in the timber trade.
Later the cutting of timber became an important part of opening up the interior as more Maori land became available. It was both an important part of the local economy - most of the early settlements were constructed form Kauri, and also an important export commodity.
Groups of men living for long periods in close proximity and in occupations which were extremely dangerous meant that real and long lasting friendships were created.Good manners and behaviour was expected and any who failed to follow the (often unwritten) rules would not last long in the camp.
The worst that could be said of a man was that he did not pull his weight on the job or that he was a thief or a cheat (gambling and alcohol was strictly banned in most camps). Any of these failings could mean that no-one would employ a man and he would have to leave the district and hope his reputation did not follow him to his new job.Miles Fairburn has used some examples to justify his idea of transience and lack of community. Subsequent research has seriously challenged this with many examples of 'mates' or familial groups working together for many years - sometimes for decades.
The sense of community extended to welfare, injured workers were ferried out by mates who would carry thier friend out on their shoulders or backs. If a death occurred leaving a family, the ir effects (clothes, tools etc) would be auctioned with their mates often paying well over the odds for the second-hand gear.
Timber saw the development of new technology, Pit Saws gave way to Steam and Bullocks were sometimes replaced by Bush trams (converted Traction Engines!!!)
The Timberjack was invented to assist the movemnet of the giant logs, as was the the Kauri Dam to move logs through hilly terrain, especially where the Corduroy Roads and Bullocks could not.
The Timber industry opened up new areas, assisting in the spread of farming and established many small towns in new area, especially the 70 Mile bush between Wellington and the Hawkes Bay, the Central North Island and in the Taranaki. The Sawmill that followed the workers attracted other small businesses . If the timber lasted long enough a small town could develop, sometimes it might be able to withstand the loss of the trade and continue to flourish as farming replaced the trees. ( Dannevirke or Featherston). If the timber ran out too quickly the town might not survive the loss. (Anyone remember Mauriceville?)Sunday, 21 August 2011
Vogels really cunning plan...
Vogel is an important figure in our history and yet the bread is better known than he is. He arrived as a Gold miner, was editor of the ODT and became a local politician in Otago, championing the idea of secession when southerners became irate at the idea that their taxes were paying for the northern war. Then he moved to central Government he would champion the rights of the Government over the Provinces, eventually having them abolished when they got in his way. His scheme which he proposed as Treasurer in 1869 was simple.
Borrow some money, use some of it to pay for Migrants to come to New Zealand and the rest to build the infrastructure needed to support the larger population as well as opening up more of the country to settlement. The migrants would expand the economy and generate more income, paying for both the interest and the loans themselves. Initially the scheme was received well.
Last year Freya asked why would the conservatively minded 'Continuous Ministry' support such a change? The answer was that public opinion drove them and many were businessmen who saw a quick quid in it for themselves as well. (Given the recent events the 2009 MP is remarkably like the 1870's version). Once the public began to clamour, the MP's willingly went along. However see below...
Almost universally it was seen as a way of boosting the colony and making many people rich. Vogel wanted to borrow 10m pounds but ended up lending 20m, a liability that would weigh heavily on the Government for many years. The road and rail networks were built and a lot of land opened up to settlers.Areas like the Wairarapa (70 Mile Bush) were opened up, and the population was doubled. new towns like Dannevirke appeared and prospered. The economy expanded but the Depression pushed down commodity prices so that the economy stagnated with real incomes reducing despite wages increasing. (ie Inflation was higher that wages). The population now included a more diverse ethnicities, including the more well known Scandanavians, but also Italians and French settlers arrived.The scheme was poorly run, money was squandered, road and rail networks were not always built where they were needed - often favouring well placed politicians and their favourites. Few of the 100,000+ people were suited to the type of work expected of them, and many preferred to stay closer to towns or cities, ignoring the opportunities in the rural areas.
This created a new (but old) phenomenon, slums. An evil many settlers thought they had left behind in Europe. Older colonists viewed them as 'scum' who were a liability and a hindrance to progress, they were angry when the expected benefits - improved wages, higher land values did not always eventuate. This was not helped as the (Long) depression hit in the latter part of the decade. Politicians who had supported Vogel abandoned him, and he eventually left for London.
There he wrote a fairly prophetic book called (I think) 2000AD about a New Zealand where the heads of Government were female...(Helen must have felt vindicated!
Sunday, 7 August 2011
Site Usage 2011
Last August I gave a quick update on site usage. I have had a some nice comments recently about the information that I've put up on nzhistory.blogspot... so this last month we had 721 visitors with 610 from New Zealand. Auckland wins again with 278 visitors but I am pleased to see we had 3 visits from Kawau Island! This year the most popular pages are Missionaries and Maori Reaction, Gold Mining (again) Prophets and Parihak. What was happening on March 24 this year we hit 264 visitors. Since I started the blog we've had 24,102 visitors with 46,000 page views. Its nice to see it being used.
Using Papers Past: Wellingtons Constitution
In April 1840 the New Zealand Company Settlers issued this Constitution. What does this tell us about their view of Hobson in the Bay of Islands? Of course Hobson could ignore this.
Below is a poster about the 1852 Constitution that Grey allowed.
And in the same edition a confirmation by "local Chiefs".
Below is a poster about the 1852 Constitution that Grey allowed.
And in the same edition a confirmation by "local Chiefs".
Tuesday, 2 August 2011
Philips and Hearn on Immigration
Between I840 and 1852 (the Crown Colony period) about 27,500 people arrived in New Zealand, of whom about two-thirds came direct from the United Kingdom. The numbers were not great, but they were significant in establishing future patterns. The major explanation for this migration is the recruiting efforts of the New Zealand Company and its offshoots, the Canterbury Association and the Otago Association. Though inspired by Edward Gibbon Wakefield's vision for an ordered community, the company was a business proposition. It purchased land from Maori for on-sale to investors who were expected to come out as 'colonists'. Many of them chose not to do so, especially those who bought land in Nelson, but a few did and became significant figures in the new communities.
Of the 27,500 people who came to New Zealand in these years, about 14,000 - over half - came as assisted immigrants, their passage paid for by the Company or its successors.
In the mid- 1840s the number of such immigrants fell to a trickle as the company faced legal and financial difficulties, the Northern War broke out and there was growing pessimism about the colony's future. Then came a second wave of assisted migrants. There was an organised group from Scotland led by Free Church Presbyterians, who arrived with boatloads of Scots in Otago in 1848. Two years later the Church of England Canterbury Association brought the first four ships of English settlers to Lyttelton.
Auckland also attracted a few smaller organised groups. In 1842, amid claims that the British government had breached an understanding not to send convicts to New Zealand, 98 young boys from Parkhurst Reformatory arrived. Another 31 followed a year later, but such was the outcry that the experiment was not repeated. Also in 1842, as we have already seen, 514 people from Paisley, near Glasgow, came out to Auckland as a response to the depression in the local shawl-making industry. There were also over 400 assisted under the Poor Law Amendment Act, administered by the Colonial Land and Emigration Commissioners.
Finally, the 1840S saw some free settlers arriving in the colony as individuals. There were some government officials, merchants and aspiring younger sons of the respectable class who came out to make a mark in the colony. Auckland attracted a number of independent immigrants from across the Tasman, including quite a few people with an Irish background.
Between 1853 and 1870 the Pakeha population rose from about 30,000 to over 250,000. Much of this increase was the result of immigration. During these years almost 250,000 people migrated to New Zealand and about 100,000 left, resulting in a net gain of almost 150,000 Probably two-thirds of the long-term migrants came direct from the United Kingdom (with the rest largely from Australia),
The provincial governments took responsibility for immigration under the New Zealand Constitution Act 1852. For the next eighteen years, until the central government began to take over immigration, most of the provinces had schemes for encouraging migrants. Usually provinces hired agents in Britain and Ireland to go out and recruit immigrants with the offer of cheap (that is, 'assisted') or free passages to New Zealand. Immigrants were seen as the key to growth and prosperity Hawke's Bay, Wellington, Nelson and Southland all had small schemes for bringing in immigrants. Otago province was more active, but unfortunately most of its records have been lost
Auckland province used a different system to attract migrants - the lure of land. Under a scheme introduced in 1858, agents in the United Kingdom had authority to grant land orders to prospective emigrants at the rate of 40 acres for every person aged eighteen or over, and 20 acres for those between five and seventeen. In the ten years of the scheme 15,516 land orders were issued, and these were probably responsible for bringing in over 40 per cent of Auckland's immigrants during these years.
Phillips and Hearn - Settlers NZ Immigrants 1800-1945
The Progress Industries
Belich has labelled the waves of migration that occurred in 1840's and 1870's as explosive.
In class, we mentioned the status of the different types of migrant. Planned settlers were those brought over in planned schemes... The NZ Company in the 1840's and the Vogel migrants in the 1870's immediately spring to mind. They were a deliberate attempt to create communities with working social systems, hence the desire for families and later single women to balance out the ratios.
Amongst these groups there were also those who paid for their passage (voyage) and were allocated cabins and better accommodation on board ship. They were also allowed to bring more luggage and were given better meals during the trip. The ships carried a lot of livestock usually sheep, pigs, poultry and sometimes cows which provided a steady stream of fresh meat, eggs and milk. Others, were Assisted passengers whose passage was paid for. They had limited allocation of luggage and existed in the Hold of the ship crammed in with little or no privacy. Their food was also limited being mainly preserved meats and biscuit (Ships bread).
The migrants who arrived sought land and the possibility of improving their station in life (their class). Initially economic growth was limited by a lack of available land especially around the NZ . Co. sites of Wellington, Nelson, Wanganui and New Plymouth. Auckland had fewer limitations while Christchurch and Dunedin established in 1848/50 had easier access to land.
Wellington and Nelson began to develop after the Hutt Valley war when the Ngati Toa stranglehold was broken. Wanganui had to wait for the end of the 1860's and the suppression of Titokowaru before they could buy land from Maori willing to sell or use the Land Court to acquire it from Maori who did not.
Economic expansion took place as the population grew. Farming initially was at a subsistence level until enough land could be broken in to create a surplus capable of being sold in local towns and cities. Tecnological advances would increase production and the development of the interior beyond the hinterland saw export industries develop beyond the timber, flax etc model.
Extensive sheep farming did not support large numbers of Yoemen farmers, but Dairying did. Sheep helped opened up the South Island and Milk Cows and farming Co-ops opened up the North Island.
Elsewhere Unplanned Immigration took place principally around Auckland where the presence of the Government meant a building boom in the 1840's. The discovery of Gold in 1860 saw a huge explosion (Belich) in immigration with tens of thousands of miners heading for the various gold fields, of Otago, the West Coast and later Thames.
Surprisingly it is Auckland an unplanned site which achieves the best growth in the first few decades of the settlement. This is primarily on the back of a boom in building due to the presence of the government and later its role as port (with two harbours) for the import and export of goods made it attractive to settlers looking for work. Readily available land also made it more attractive than the southern townships which were facing Maori opposition to settler expansion. In the 1860's the steady build up of the military to fight the King also turned Auckland into a 'little Sydney'.
Some of the first unplanned migrants had in fact been Australian Squatters who fled the drought stricken Australian grasslands for the south island. Their numbers were rapidly overtaken by the Planned settlers in Christchurch and Dunedin who also saw the potential for Sheep farming on a grand scale. Through various rorts most of the South Islands best land had been taken over by 1890.
Economic development relied on a growing population to create the local markets, provide the initiative and funding for further development and the labour to work on the newly acquired land.
NEW 2011 (taken from a Belich speech)
Progressive colonisation, my first era, was characterised by immensely fast growth. New Zealand grew, in terms of pakeha, from 2000 settlers in 1840 to half a million people by the early 1880s, in 42 years. The economic centrepiece of the progressive colonising system was something I call the progress industries. Basically, they were massive, assisted immigration schemes, frenetic public and private development of transport infrastructure, and so on. An example of the kind of leading archetype is the Vogelian rail building boom that ran at five times the rate of any other rail building in New Zealand history.
The whole thing was funded by British credit. This was extracted from London to the extent of 71 million pounds between 1840 and 1886 by New Zealand entrepreneurs who didn't ask politely, but rather whistled south Britain's spare millions, like a pack of Pied Pipers. For 71 million, of course, you should read billion in terms of contemporary social impact.
The progress industry had a number of allied extractive industries: flax, timber and most notably gold. But despite substantial gold and wool exports the New Zealand economy under progressive colonisation was a net importer of both goods and capital. Progressive colonial New Zealand was town and camp led. Settlement was led by towns and camps, not by farms. The notion that it was farm led is a retrospective myth supplied by the succeeding era, each generation writing its own history.
Progressive colonial pakeha had all the ethics of a calicivirus in their attitudes to both nature and natives. They mowed through thousand-year forests like grass; they burned hills into sheep walks where sheep could barely stagger; and they impacted massively on the indigenous Maori people who, despite a remarkable resilience and a remarkably effective resistance, were eventually marginalised.
In class, we mentioned the status of the different types of migrant. Planned settlers were those brought over in planned schemes... The NZ Company in the 1840's and the Vogel migrants in the 1870's immediately spring to mind. They were a deliberate attempt to create communities with working social systems, hence the desire for families and later single women to balance out the ratios.
Amongst these groups there were also those who paid for their passage (voyage) and were allocated cabins and better accommodation on board ship. They were also allowed to bring more luggage and were given better meals during the trip. The ships carried a lot of livestock usually sheep, pigs, poultry and sometimes cows which provided a steady stream of fresh meat, eggs and milk. Others, were Assisted passengers whose passage was paid for. They had limited allocation of luggage and existed in the Hold of the ship crammed in with little or no privacy. Their food was also limited being mainly preserved meats and biscuit (Ships bread).
The migrants who arrived sought land and the possibility of improving their station in life (their class). Initially economic growth was limited by a lack of available land especially around the NZ . Co. sites of Wellington, Nelson, Wanganui and New Plymouth. Auckland had fewer limitations while Christchurch and Dunedin established in 1848/50 had easier access to land.
Wellington and Nelson began to develop after the Hutt Valley war when the Ngati Toa stranglehold was broken. Wanganui had to wait for the end of the 1860's and the suppression of Titokowaru before they could buy land from Maori willing to sell or use the Land Court to acquire it from Maori who did not.
Economic expansion took place as the population grew. Farming initially was at a subsistence level until enough land could be broken in to create a surplus capable of being sold in local towns and cities. Tecnological advances would increase production and the development of the interior beyond the hinterland saw export industries develop beyond the timber, flax etc model.
Extensive sheep farming did not support large numbers of Yoemen farmers, but Dairying did. Sheep helped opened up the South Island and Milk Cows and farming Co-ops opened up the North Island.
Elsewhere Unplanned Immigration took place principally around Auckland where the presence of the Government meant a building boom in the 1840's. The discovery of Gold in 1860 saw a huge explosion (Belich) in immigration with tens of thousands of miners heading for the various gold fields, of Otago, the West Coast and later Thames.
Surprisingly it is Auckland an unplanned site which achieves the best growth in the first few decades of the settlement. This is primarily on the back of a boom in building due to the presence of the government and later its role as port (with two harbours) for the import and export of goods made it attractive to settlers looking for work. Readily available land also made it more attractive than the southern townships which were facing Maori opposition to settler expansion. In the 1860's the steady build up of the military to fight the King also turned Auckland into a 'little Sydney'.
Some of the first unplanned migrants had in fact been Australian Squatters who fled the drought stricken Australian grasslands for the south island. Their numbers were rapidly overtaken by the Planned settlers in Christchurch and Dunedin who also saw the potential for Sheep farming on a grand scale. Through various rorts most of the South Islands best land had been taken over by 1890.
Economic development relied on a growing population to create the local markets, provide the initiative and funding for further development and the labour to work on the newly acquired land.
NEW 2011 (taken from a Belich speech)
Progressive colonisation, my first era, was characterised by immensely fast growth. New Zealand grew, in terms of pakeha, from 2000 settlers in 1840 to half a million people by the early 1880s, in 42 years. The economic centrepiece of the progressive colonising system was something I call the progress industries. Basically, they were massive, assisted immigration schemes, frenetic public and private development of transport infrastructure, and so on. An example of the kind of leading archetype is the Vogelian rail building boom that ran at five times the rate of any other rail building in New Zealand history.
The whole thing was funded by British credit. This was extracted from London to the extent of 71 million pounds between 1840 and 1886 by New Zealand entrepreneurs who didn't ask politely, but rather whistled south Britain's spare millions, like a pack of Pied Pipers. For 71 million, of course, you should read billion in terms of contemporary social impact.
The progress industry had a number of allied extractive industries: flax, timber and most notably gold. But despite substantial gold and wool exports the New Zealand economy under progressive colonisation was a net importer of both goods and capital. Progressive colonial New Zealand was town and camp led. Settlement was led by towns and camps, not by farms. The notion that it was farm led is a retrospective myth supplied by the succeeding era, each generation writing its own history.
Progressive colonial pakeha had all the ethics of a calicivirus in their attitudes to both nature and natives. They mowed through thousand-year forests like grass; they burned hills into sheep walks where sheep could barely stagger; and they impacted massively on the indigenous Maori people who, despite a remarkable resilience and a remarkably effective resistance, were eventually marginalised.
Thursday, 28 July 2011
Thursday, 16 June 2011
The search for a Maori Government
We generally associate Maori seperatism with The King Movement but there were many other groups who tried to create a seperate form of Government, often running beside the Pakeha system. It could be argued that Hongi and Te Rauparaha were evidence of this in the 1830's but the answer to this (although you could argue against this) is that they never wanted to establish a seperate Maori state simply to establish their Rangatiratanga over their own Rohe.
In fact Hongi didn't want to drive Pakeha away he wanted MORE of them. While Te Rauparaha has been called the 'Napoleon' of the south he was keen to have Pakeha around him and doesn't seem to have been wholly enthusiatic about the Wairau and was only an observer of the Wellington/Hutt valley war.
So where do we begin?
Kohimaramara in 1860 is Gore-Browns attmpt to undermine the Kingitanga and in its first meeting seems to show that Maori are divided and that a parliament is possible (and called for). His replacement Grey topedoes that and uses the Runanga's (Local Councils) to try and gain Maori compliance. It fails.
We have spent some time talking about the Kingitanga, but a quick reprise.... 1850's Maori disquiet over continual land losses... a campaign to find a suitable candidate finds Te Wherowhero the Kingitanga emerges in 1858 as a 'Land League' denying the Government and the Settlers any more land... creaesa climate of fear and anger. War in the Waitara leads to War in the Waikato and Tauranga. The Settler Government creates Legislation to allow confiscation and Greys invasion makes all Maori "rebels". Maori thus lost 2m acres confiscated and millions more disappear under the machinations of the Land Court.
After the loss of Rangiowhaia the King retreats into his Rohe. By the time he emerges in 1882 his political power is diminished by the actions of his affiliated tries including his allies Maniapoto.
His trip to visit Queen Victoria (to talk about the Treaty) in 1884 is a failure when the British send him back to NZ because it is no longer 'their' problem.
It could be argued that the Pai Marire faith had an element of separatism in its view especially the belief by Te Ua Haumene that at the day of reckoning Pakeha would leave New Zealand and it would be returned to Maori - an idea that drove some of the Hau Hau into battle.
The Governmment continues to gnaw away at Maori land holdings, as more land is lost the ability for Maori to achieve Economic (and Political) independence disappeared with it. Greys idea of digging around the King has eventually worked.
The 1872 Repudiation Movement was relatively localised and made little impression. Whether it belongs here is debatable.
Is Parihaka an example of separatism? Te Whiti and Tohu seems to have rejected Pakeha culture but retained much of its technology. The Village was the first place to get electricity and Te Whiti lived in avery nice Colonial Villa. They refused to teach their children in English and used Te Reo in the school. Its invasion and destruction in 1882 after many of its menfolk were exiled to Otago meant its viability was unlikely. Pakeha viewed it as a separatist movement with dangerous overtones of Hau Hau - an idea supported by the presence of an older Titokowaru who had given up his fight and returned to his more peaceful faith. Bryce certainly fanned the flames to ensure the Village was destroyed.
In 1892 the Kotahitanga Movement emerges in the far North based around mainly Kupapa tribes and with Ngapua Hone Heke as its leader. Because it rejected the King it could never really be seen as 'National' Maori body and with no recognition from the Government never really stood a chance.
The King is the centre of the last large(ish) movement in 1894, Kauhanganui. Based around the Kingitanga it is rejected by most of the North Islands Iwi and like Kotahitanga is ignored by the Government.
Once again it is Maori tribalism that inhibits them...
In fact Hongi didn't want to drive Pakeha away he wanted MORE of them. While Te Rauparaha has been called the 'Napoleon' of the south he was keen to have Pakeha around him and doesn't seem to have been wholly enthusiatic about the Wairau and was only an observer of the Wellington/Hutt valley war.
So where do we begin?
Kohimaramara in 1860 is Gore-Browns attmpt to undermine the Kingitanga and in its first meeting seems to show that Maori are divided and that a parliament is possible (and called for). His replacement Grey topedoes that and uses the Runanga's (Local Councils) to try and gain Maori compliance. It fails.
We have spent some time talking about the Kingitanga, but a quick reprise.... 1850's Maori disquiet over continual land losses... a campaign to find a suitable candidate finds Te Wherowhero the Kingitanga emerges in 1858 as a 'Land League' denying the Government and the Settlers any more land... creaesa climate of fear and anger. War in the Waitara leads to War in the Waikato and Tauranga. The Settler Government creates Legislation to allow confiscation and Greys invasion makes all Maori "rebels". Maori thus lost 2m acres confiscated and millions more disappear under the machinations of the Land Court.
After the loss of Rangiowhaia the King retreats into his Rohe. By the time he emerges in 1882 his political power is diminished by the actions of his affiliated tries including his allies Maniapoto.
His trip to visit Queen Victoria (to talk about the Treaty) in 1884 is a failure when the British send him back to NZ because it is no longer 'their' problem.
It could be argued that the Pai Marire faith had an element of separatism in its view especially the belief by Te Ua Haumene that at the day of reckoning Pakeha would leave New Zealand and it would be returned to Maori - an idea that drove some of the Hau Hau into battle.
The Governmment continues to gnaw away at Maori land holdings, as more land is lost the ability for Maori to achieve Economic (and Political) independence disappeared with it. Greys idea of digging around the King has eventually worked.
The 1872 Repudiation Movement was relatively localised and made little impression. Whether it belongs here is debatable.
Is Parihaka an example of separatism? Te Whiti and Tohu seems to have rejected Pakeha culture but retained much of its technology. The Village was the first place to get electricity and Te Whiti lived in avery nice Colonial Villa. They refused to teach their children in English and used Te Reo in the school. Its invasion and destruction in 1882 after many of its menfolk were exiled to Otago meant its viability was unlikely. Pakeha viewed it as a separatist movement with dangerous overtones of Hau Hau - an idea supported by the presence of an older Titokowaru who had given up his fight and returned to his more peaceful faith. Bryce certainly fanned the flames to ensure the Village was destroyed.
In 1892 the Kotahitanga Movement emerges in the far North based around mainly Kupapa tribes and with Ngapua Hone Heke as its leader. Because it rejected the King it could never really be seen as 'National' Maori body and with no recognition from the Government never really stood a chance.
The King is the centre of the last large(ish) movement in 1894, Kauhanganui. Based around the Kingitanga it is rejected by most of the North Islands Iwi and like Kotahitanga is ignored by the Government.
Once again it is Maori tribalism that inhibits them...
From battlefield to Courtroom
The wars could be said to be an attempt to impose British Authority by the Settler Government. But the desire for land seems to be just as important, and the behaviour of Russell and Whitaker in particular appear to show that the need for land was a driving force behind the campaigns into the Waikato... below are some links to the 1966 Encyclopedia:
http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/1966/whitaker-sir-frederick/1
In 1862 Whitaker supported the Runanga policy in the hope that it would ease land alienation; in the following year he advanced a complex policy to achieve this end by force. He and Russell had already dominated Domett; in 1863 he, as Premier, and Russell, as Defence Minister, easily converted the Native Minister, Fox, to their belligerent policy.
His Cabinet was in essence the spearhead of the Auckland pro-war party. Full ministerial responsibility for native affairs was accepted, in an effort to neutralise the Governor, Grey, and three crucial Acts followed. The Suppression of Rebellion Act suspended habeas corpus and introduced martial law into disturbed districts; the New Zealand Settlements Act provided for the punitive confiscation of rebel natives' land (some 4¼ million acres were at first envisaged); while the Loan Act (which, because it conflicted with an Imperial Act, ought to have been reserved, but in fact received Grey's assent) authorised a loan of £3 million to develop this extensive domain.
http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/1966/maori-wars/3
...the wars were mainly a series of pitched battles in which each tribe made a final, desperate stand on its tribal domain: Atiawa at Waitara, Waikato at Rangiriri, Ngati Maniapoto at Orakau, and Ngai-te-Rangi at Gate pa. ... for the survivors the future was clouded with bitterness: they had to endure confiscation, the permanent loss of their valued land.
....the European victory was final. Time and numbers were on their side and the confiscated lands were gradually settled by European farmers.
... 3,215,172 acres of Maori land were confiscated in the Waikato, Taranaki, and the Bay of Plenty. Of this area 1,341,362 acres were subsequently purchased or returned, mainly to “friendly” or “loyalist” Maoris. In confiscating the land, little heed was paid to the degree of “guilt” of the “rebels”, and it was noticeable that the best of the confiscated land was retained by the Government for European settlement.
.. .Under the Native Lands Acts of 1862 and 1865 the Crown's right of pre-emption was abolished, a Maori Land Court was established to individualise Maori land titles and European settlers were permitted to purchase land directly from the individuals named in the Court's orders. This was part of a wider policy designed to fulfil the promise of the Treaty of Waitangi to grant Maoris the rights and privileges of European citizens, including representation in Parliament.
But it was the land legislation which had the most disastrous results for the Maoris who became involved.
http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/1966/whitaker-sir-frederick/1
In 1862 Whitaker supported the Runanga policy in the hope that it would ease land alienation; in the following year he advanced a complex policy to achieve this end by force. He and Russell had already dominated Domett; in 1863 he, as Premier, and Russell, as Defence Minister, easily converted the Native Minister, Fox, to their belligerent policy.
His Cabinet was in essence the spearhead of the Auckland pro-war party. Full ministerial responsibility for native affairs was accepted, in an effort to neutralise the Governor, Grey, and three crucial Acts followed. The Suppression of Rebellion Act suspended habeas corpus and introduced martial law into disturbed districts; the New Zealand Settlements Act provided for the punitive confiscation of rebel natives' land (some 4¼ million acres were at first envisaged); while the Loan Act (which, because it conflicted with an Imperial Act, ought to have been reserved, but in fact received Grey's assent) authorised a loan of £3 million to develop this extensive domain.http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/1966/maori-wars/3
...the wars were mainly a series of pitched battles in which each tribe made a final, desperate stand on its tribal domain: Atiawa at Waitara, Waikato at Rangiriri, Ngati Maniapoto at Orakau, and Ngai-te-Rangi at Gate pa. ... for the survivors the future was clouded with bitterness: they had to endure confiscation, the permanent loss of their valued land.
....the European victory was final. Time and numbers were on their side and the confiscated lands were gradually settled by European farmers.
... 3,215,172 acres of Maori land were confiscated in the Waikato, Taranaki, and the Bay of Plenty. Of this area 1,341,362 acres were subsequently purchased or returned, mainly to “friendly” or “loyalist” Maoris. In confiscating the land, little heed was paid to the degree of “guilt” of the “rebels”, and it was noticeable that the best of the confiscated land was retained by the Government for European settlement.
.. .Under the Native Lands Acts of 1862 and 1865 the Crown's right of pre-emption was abolished, a Maori Land Court was established to individualise Maori land titles and European settlers were permitted to purchase land directly from the individuals named in the Court's orders. This was part of a wider policy designed to fulfil the promise of the Treaty of Waitangi to grant Maoris the rights and privileges of European citizens, including representation in Parliament.
But it was the land legislation which had the most disastrous results for the Maoris who became involved.
Another Act of War (Binney)
While hostilities continued in the Tauranga Taranaki and East Coast the Settler government began to legislate to ensure even more land could be made available. They did so by ignoring any obligation under Article 2 or 3 of the Treaty.
Judith Binney has called this an "Act of War' and she is probably right.
The Native Land Court was established under legislation in 1862 and then 1865. It had two main aims. The First was to identify and establish ownership of Maori land and convert the communal form of ownership to a European title. Once under title it could then be sold to Settlers. Henry Sewell said it was designed to undermine and destroy Maori culture (detribalise) by ridding them of the communist thread that ran through all of their institutions.
The Court could investigate ownership and establish title - both a long protracted and expensive process. The Owners could then present their decision to the governor to recieve a freehold title.
No matter how large the area under investigation it could be placed into the control of only 10 trustees. Later legislation would shift the ownership of the land to the trustee who were then free to do as they wished with it, without consulting the larger group of 'owners'.
No matter Settlers could now acquire land outside the confiscation areas.
By 1872 the Court had investigated 5m acres of land.
The 1873 Land Act went further making every member of the tribe an owner on a title. Land could be sold if a simple majority agreed to it.
In the Hawkes Bay, groups of claimants, surveyors and shopkeepers exploited the system to effectively steal Maori land by forcing them to defend often dubious claims and rorting them through the debts this incurred.
Judith Binney has called this an "Act of War' and she is probably right.
The Native Land Court was established under legislation in 1862 and then 1865. It had two main aims. The First was to identify and establish ownership of Maori land and convert the communal form of ownership to a European title. Once under title it could then be sold to Settlers. Henry Sewell said it was designed to undermine and destroy Maori culture (detribalise) by ridding them of the communist thread that ran through all of their institutions.
The Court could investigate ownership and establish title - both a long protracted and expensive process. The Owners could then present their decision to the governor to recieve a freehold title.
No matter how large the area under investigation it could be placed into the control of only 10 trustees. Later legislation would shift the ownership of the land to the trustee who were then free to do as they wished with it, without consulting the larger group of 'owners'.
No matter Settlers could now acquire land outside the confiscation areas.
By 1872 the Court had investigated 5m acres of land.
The 1873 Land Act went further making every member of the tribe an owner on a title. Land could be sold if a simple majority agreed to it.
In the Hawkes Bay, groups of claimants, surveyors and shopkeepers exploited the system to effectively steal Maori land by forcing them to defend often dubious claims and rorting them through the debts this incurred.
The Gate Pa
In Tauranga, the local Ngaitirangi tribe led by Rawiri Puhirake had been supporters of the Waikato tribes fighting the British. Cameron had sent a small force to camp Te Papa to control the tribe. The Ngaitirangi gathered in the Te Papa area to fight the British. They built a pa close to the camp, when this provoked little response, they built one even closer and sent this message:
Once again Cameron faced a Modern Pa, but this one was differerent to other fortifications. The pa was shelled from 9am until almost 4pm. When a breach had been made in the outer fence a force of 300 was sent into the pa. Confusion followed and the force was driven back.British casualties were more than a third of the assault force with 100 men killed or wounded. Ten officers were killed while 28 non-commissioned officers and privates were killed and 73 wounded. The 43rd Regiment lost 20 killed (including its colonel, Colonel Booth, 4 captains and a lieutenant) and 12 wounded.
The Settlers and Government expecting a great victory charged the soldiers and the dead officers with cowardice. Cameron was also seen as a scapegoat, no-one it seemed was prepared to give the Maori their due. The Pa was by most measures a wondeful piece of construction. It withstood a massive bombardment and the defences seem to have forseen the style of attack with defences turned inward which mean there were no defenders to attack - they were all safely ensconced within their bunkers. having made their point the Ngaiterangi abandoned the Pa as was the custom.
To the Colonel,Friend, -Salutations to you. The end of that. Friend, do you give heed to our laws for regulating the fight.
Rule 1. If wounded or captured whole, and butt of the musket or hilt of the sword be turned to me, he will be saved.
Rule 2. If any Pakeha, being a soldier by name, shall be travelling unarmed and meets me, he will be captured, and handed over to the direction of the law.
Rule 3. The soldier who flees, being carried away by his fears, and goes to the house of the priest with his gun (even though carrying arms) will be saved. I will not go there.
Rule 4. The unarmed Pakehas, women and children, will be spared.The end. These are binding laws for Tauranga.
This was just what Cameron wanted. He quickly abandoned the Waikato and travelled to Taurange with a large force. In all there were over 1700 Imperial and local Militia concentrated at Te Papa. They brought with them some of the heaviest artillery yet …
Belich wrote:''The concentration of British artillery was of considerable power even in absolute terms. When it is considered that these guns fired unhampered by enemy artillery from a distance of 350 to 800 yards [320 to 730 meters] at a target of less that 3,000 square yards [2,500 square meters], their power appears awesome. Gate Pa was the ultimate test of strength between British and Maori military technologies, between modern artillery and the modern pa. In a wider sense, it was to be the first of many contests between breech-loading, rifled, composite-cast heavy artillery and trench-and-bunker earthworks."
Once again Cameron faced a Modern Pa, but this one was differerent to other fortifications. The pa was shelled from 9am until almost 4pm. When a breach had been made in the outer fence a force of 300 was sent into the pa. Confusion followed and the force was driven back.British casualties were more than a third of the assault force with 100 men killed or wounded. Ten officers were killed while 28 non-commissioned officers and privates were killed and 73 wounded. The 43rd Regiment lost 20 killed (including its colonel, Colonel Booth, 4 captains and a lieutenant) and 12 wounded.
The 68th Regiment lost 4 killed and 16 wounded. The Naval Brigade lost 13 killed (including virtually all of its officers) and 26 wounded. Total Maori losses were estimated at 25.In the confusion and rain that followed the Maori garrison faded into the bush.(New 2008: The blame game immediately followed.
The Settlers and Government expecting a great victory charged the soldiers and the dead officers with cowardice. Cameron was also seen as a scapegoat, no-one it seemed was prepared to give the Maori their due. The Pa was by most measures a wondeful piece of construction. It withstood a massive bombardment and the defences seem to have forseen the style of attack with defences turned inward which mean there were no defenders to attack - they were all safely ensconced within their bunkers. having made their point the Ngaiterangi abandoned the Pa as was the custom.Two months later a force of 1700 troops routed a 500 of Maori caugt in the middle of building a pa at Te Ranga. This defeat seemed to pacify the Ngatiterangi who surrendered their weapons at Te Papa a month later.
Wednesday, 25 May 2011
The Waikato Campaign.
Greys intention was always to destroy the base of the King. That meant advancing into the Waikato and attacking him in his Turangawaiwai. His motives were simple. Remove the King and he would remove the one obstacle to establishing (his) hegemony over the country. Colonial Administrators wanted more. Much, much, more.
Russell and Whitaker dominated the Government but also had a personal reason for wanting to invade and confiscate Maori land.Their small cabal of investors were envious of the Maori farms which supplied Auckland and the Australian colonies with produce.
They saw great potential if this land could be acquired cheaply (Confiscation is about as cheap as you can get) and then sold at a profit to the ever growing number of settlers arriving in the colony. Maori farms remained communally owned and the Waikato was the seat of the Kingite ‘Land League’ which stubbornly refused to become alienated from any more of its land.
The Settler Government acquired the £3m loan which paid for the arrival of the ‘Fencibles’, militia who would be paid for their service to the Government with grants of land in the confiscated areas, fulfilling two goals. This force meant the Settler government could show that they were playing their part in the war as well as providing a long term force capable of mobilisation at a moments notice (The NZ version of the Minute men?).
To Rangiriri, which was again a massive set of fortifications (amongst the worlds largest according to Belich) which ran between the river and a Lake forcing the British to attack head on. Because they controlled the river they were able to land troops behind the line and attack from both sides. Despite this advantage the Maori held out, repulsing several attacks at least one of which reached the central redoubt before being pushed back.
The next morning under what the Maori claimed was a flag of truce, the British captured 180 Maori, the rump of the army that had initially been prepared to fight them – the rest had again disappeared. Not surprisingly within 18 months almost all of these prisoners had escaped.Cameron marched on.
Orakau was an unfortunate accident for the Kingites. Newly arrived Ngati Porou & Tuhoe unhappy at missing out on previous battles chose to build a pa in a poorly positioned site.It was easily surrounded, had no escape route, and was incomplete. to make matters worse it had little food and no water. To compound matters they were surprised and had no chance to send their women away.
Much of what happened here has been idealised and used to mythologise the wars. Rewi has been depicted as brave ("friend I will fight for ever and ever") and the Maori as stoic ("The women and children are to die as well" ). Surrounded with little ammunition and no water it should have been a stunning victory.
That Cameron killed 80 odd Maori was some consolation but the escape of Rewi Maniapoto was a disappointment.
Cameron also realized that he had advanced as far as logistics would allow. The King ensconced with his Maniapoto kin was safe from Greys paddle ships and Cameron's lines of communication were now too long and difficult to defend.
Despondent Cameron then recieved news of a opportunity at Tauranga...
Russell and Whitaker dominated the Government but also had a personal reason for wanting to invade and confiscate Maori land.Their small cabal of investors were envious of the Maori farms which supplied Auckland and the Australian colonies with produce.
They saw great potential if this land could be acquired cheaply (Confiscation is about as cheap as you can get) and then sold at a profit to the ever growing number of settlers arriving in the colony. Maori farms remained communally owned and the Waikato was the seat of the Kingite ‘Land League’ which stubbornly refused to become alienated from any more of its land.
The Settler Government acquired the £3m loan which paid for the arrival of the ‘Fencibles’, militia who would be paid for their service to the Government with grants of land in the confiscated areas, fulfilling two goals. This force meant the Settler government could show that they were playing their part in the war as well as providing a long term force capable of mobilisation at a moments notice (The NZ version of the Minute men?).
The invasion itself went slowly. General Cameron was a professional soldier who had a distinguished career, he was expected to crush the Kingites in short order. The Great South Road made it easy for him to shift men and supplies to the Waikato but not into it. Progress was slow and made even slower by Maori attacks on the fringes of Auckland. This necessitated leaving soldiers behind to protect both Auckland and the supply lines. It took three months to reach Meremere.In some respects Maori tactics had been to successful.
A force of 1500 warriors had erected the Meremere line and waited patiently for the British to arrive. But 3 months was to long and many had been forced to return home, leaving a force to small to defend the fortifications. After a brief fire-fight, which included Maori use of artillery, the defenders melted back into the forest and Cameron marched on.
To Rangiriri, which was again a massive set of fortifications (amongst the worlds largest according to Belich) which ran between the river and a Lake forcing the British to attack head on. Because they controlled the river they were able to land troops behind the line and attack from both sides. Despite this advantage the Maori held out, repulsing several attacks at least one of which reached the central redoubt before being pushed back.The next morning under what the Maori claimed was a flag of truce, the British captured 180 Maori, the rump of the army that had initially been prepared to fight them – the rest had again disappeared. Not surprisingly within 18 months almost all of these prisoners had escaped.Cameron marched on.
He captured the empty Ngaruawahia, capital of the King. He then reached a third line of fortifications. This was the Paterangi line, even bigger than those at Rangiriri. Intelligence said this was defended by a far larger force than at the previous battle. If a few defenders could hold him back there what could a larger force in better prepared positions do? Cameron decided to repeat his tactics, and bypassed the line by landing at Rangiaowhia, a village the Maori believed to be neutral. Many old people and children were killed when the whare caught alight during the fighting here.
Afterwards when Cameron advanced on Paterangi he again found it abandoned. The King and most of his followers had again vanished travelling south into the fastness of the Maniapoto. He could go no further. His lines of communication were to long and he would have to leave the security of the river and venture into the forests of the interior.
He needed another way of proving his mettle.
He needed another way of proving his mettle.
Orakau was an unfortunate accident for the Kingites. Newly arrived Ngati Porou & Tuhoe unhappy at missing out on previous battles chose to build a pa in a poorly positioned site.It was easily surrounded, had no escape route, and was incomplete. to make matters worse it had little food and no water. To compound matters they were surprised and had no chance to send their women away.
Much of what happened here has been idealised and used to mythologise the wars. Rewi has been depicted as brave ("friend I will fight for ever and ever") and the Maori as stoic ("The women and children are to die as well" ). Surrounded with little ammunition and no water it should have been a stunning victory.
That Cameron killed 80 odd Maori was some consolation but the escape of Rewi Maniapoto was a disappointment.
Cameron also realized that he had advanced as far as logistics would allow. The King ensconced with his Maniapoto kin was safe from Greys paddle ships and Cameron's lines of communication were now too long and difficult to defend.
Despondent Cameron then recieved news of a opportunity at Tauranga...
Challeging the King
Grey returned perhaps expecting that his old policies (Flour & Sugar) would continue to work.
In only a few years much had changed. Thousands more settlers had arrived with an eye on Maori 'wastelands' and little patience with Government efforts to treat Maori fairly. Maori for their part had decided to unite in their desire to hold onto their lands and had chosen a King to represent them and their wish to remain economically and politically separate.
Maori and Pakeha relations had changed with the Settlers determined to enforce the dominance of the British empire and their right to wastelands. Maori for their part appear determined to retain control of their lands, and Greys platitudes no longer worked.Grey wanted to attack the King but lacked necessary resources. In particular he needed more troops. He could get some troops from local militia but not the thousands of professional troops he wanted.
Grey had seen the Wars in the North and Taranaki falter and fail because of a lack of logistical suport and a lack of manpower. To create a sound infrastructure for an invasion he constructed the Great South Road. This led directly from Auckland to the banks of the Mangatawhiri Stream.
A regiment could now disembark at Queen Wharf (todays 'Party Central') and virtually march directly into battle if necessary.. Grey just needed the troops.The Imperial Government would not give him soldiers without good reason. Grey had no valid reason so he lied. Then he lied some more, and some more.
In the ‘wars’ video Belich mentions the drunken rambling of the Maori called Whare who talked about a planned attack by Maori and French collaborators on Auckland. It was this ‘threat’ that Grey continued to hammer on about, much as Busby had harped on about the French threat in the 1830’s. Why the Maori would attack their best market Grey never explained. What they would achieve by driving the Pakeha out of New Zealand was never explained. However I guess within the Colonial Office the idea that natives might resent them and want to kill them wasn’t far from their thoughts (of course they would be confirmed in the Indian Mutiny of 1857). So the Colonial Office sent troops, lots and lots of troops. Thousands of troops.
So Grey assured Maori he did not seek war but would ‘dig around the King’. Meanwhile he built his army and then built the Great South Road pointing into the heart of the Waikato. Once he had an army capable of defeating the King, Grey set about starting the war. The Mangatawhiri Stream lay on the Kings Rohe (border), north was settler Auckland, south was the Kingitanga.
In only a few years much had changed. Thousands more settlers had arrived with an eye on Maori 'wastelands' and little patience with Government efforts to treat Maori fairly. Maori for their part had decided to unite in their desire to hold onto their lands and had chosen a King to represent them and their wish to remain economically and politically separate.
Maori and Pakeha relations had changed with the Settlers determined to enforce the dominance of the British empire and their right to wastelands. Maori for their part appear determined to retain control of their lands, and Greys platitudes no longer worked.Grey wanted to attack the King but lacked necessary resources. In particular he needed more troops. He could get some troops from local militia but not the thousands of professional troops he wanted.
Grey had seen the Wars in the North and Taranaki falter and fail because of a lack of logistical suport and a lack of manpower. To create a sound infrastructure for an invasion he constructed the Great South Road. This led directly from Auckland to the banks of the Mangatawhiri Stream.A regiment could now disembark at Queen Wharf (todays 'Party Central') and virtually march directly into battle if necessary.. Grey just needed the troops.The Imperial Government would not give him soldiers without good reason. Grey had no valid reason so he lied. Then he lied some more, and some more.
In the ‘wars’ video Belich mentions the drunken rambling of the Maori called Whare who talked about a planned attack by Maori and French collaborators on Auckland. It was this ‘threat’ that Grey continued to hammer on about, much as Busby had harped on about the French threat in the 1830’s. Why the Maori would attack their best market Grey never explained. What they would achieve by driving the Pakeha out of New Zealand was never explained. However I guess within the Colonial Office the idea that natives might resent them and want to kill them wasn’t far from their thoughts (of course they would be confirmed in the Indian Mutiny of 1857). So the Colonial Office sent troops, lots and lots of troops. Thousands of troops.
As 1862 moved into 1863 Greys war machine grew,The Government for its own part took out a £3m loan secured by the promise of confiscated lands. It recruited troops from Australia on the promise of free land. (The 'Fencibles' ) While Dommett was Premier he was supported by Russell and Whitaker land speculators who pushed hard for the war and would profit spectacularly from the confiscations. Unfortunately many of the fencibles would receive land that was almost unworkable for poor farmers. Russell and Whitaker would buy up much of this land later for a pittance.
So Grey assured Maori he did not seek war but would ‘dig around the King’. Meanwhile he built his army and then built the Great South Road pointing into the heart of the Waikato. Once he had an army capable of defeating the King, Grey set about starting the war. The Mangatawhiri Stream lay on the Kings Rohe (border), north was settler Auckland, south was the Kingitanga.Crossing the stream meant war. In July Cameron crossed the stream but Grey backdated the declaration that any Maori who did not acknowledge the Queens authority would be in rebellion. When Maori resisted at Koheroa just south of the Mangatawhiri the Waikato War had started.
Sunday, 15 May 2011
This land is your land, this land is my land....
The end of the Wellington Wars did not settle anything in particular apart from enforcing the NZ Company's claims to land around some of its settlements.
Grey stayed until called to South Africa. At that point he allowed a new Constitution to be introduced. This established the Provincial System. At last the settlers had a voice in Government but to their annoyance the Governor retained control over Native affairs, denying them access to Maori land.
Land (via pre-emption) remained under the control of the Governor.Despite this Maori land continued to be alienated. Donald McLean acting on behalf of the Governor was able to buy large areas of land, but not in areas which were most desired by settlers (especially in the Taranaki or Waikato) remained out of their reach.
In a reaction to the continued loss of land and the consequent loss of rangatiratanga and mana over their land some Maori began to seek an alternative. The Queen represented all of the Pakeha,
Maori should have their own King.
From 1852 Te Rauparaha and TeWhiwhi campaigned for a figure to represent all Maori. They approached several leading figures, none of who whom felt they had the necessary Mana needed for such a position.
Eventually Te Wherwhero accepted the mantle becoming King Potatau.The Kingitanga represented a challenge to settler aspirations and the Governments purse. For settlers it also represented a defiance of British control of New Zealand. They could not countenance a separatist King in a British New Zealand.The King and his supporters saw it in a different light. Besides now representing Maori (the red, black and white threads) he was keen to work with the Government.
Because of the perceived threat the Governors however lost faith in him.Governor Gore Brown it seems was determined to force the issue of who controlled the country. When Teira offered him land at Waitara it seemed a golden opportunity to show the power of Britain. Unfortnately Teira had only a minor claim to the area. Wiremu Kingi (te Atiawa) had a stronger claim and so did the Waikato who had driven the Te Atiawa off the land during the Musket Wars.
When the war broke out the British and settlers found themselves surrounded and penned into New Plymouth. The ring of modern Pa which encircled the town became a challenge which first Colonel Gold then General Pratt unsuccessfully attacked with cannon then sap.Neither seemed to appreciate the tactic that kept them occupied with relatively unimportant military targets. The war meandered along with the Maori out-digging the Imperial Troops.
The involvement of Kingitanga warriors appeared to confirm the Pakeha belief that the King intended to enforce a Land League and to stand in the way of British law by stopping the sale by Teira of the Waitara. The challenge to the rule of law seems to have been a Government preoccupation, as many settlers recognised the weakness of Teiras claim to the land.The end of the war was claimed as victory by the returning Grey although his failure to punish the ‘rebels’ seems to indicate the weak case that they had and their inability to defeat an enemy who would not stay still. As it happens Grey believed he needed to strike at the heart of Maori resistance – the King in the Waikato
Grey stayed until called to South Africa. At that point he allowed a new Constitution to be introduced. This established the Provincial System. At last the settlers had a voice in Government but to their annoyance the Governor retained control over Native affairs, denying them access to Maori land.
Land (via pre-emption) remained under the control of the Governor.Despite this Maori land continued to be alienated. Donald McLean acting on behalf of the Governor was able to buy large areas of land, but not in areas which were most desired by settlers (especially in the Taranaki or Waikato) remained out of their reach.In a reaction to the continued loss of land and the consequent loss of rangatiratanga and mana over their land some Maori began to seek an alternative. The Queen represented all of the Pakeha,
Maori should have their own King.
From 1852 Te Rauparaha and TeWhiwhi campaigned for a figure to represent all Maori. They approached several leading figures, none of who whom felt they had the necessary Mana needed for such a position.
Eventually Te Wherwhero accepted the mantle becoming King Potatau.The Kingitanga represented a challenge to settler aspirations and the Governments purse. For settlers it also represented a defiance of British control of New Zealand. They could not countenance a separatist King in a British New Zealand.The King and his supporters saw it in a different light. Besides now representing Maori (the red, black and white threads) he was keen to work with the Government.
Because of the perceived threat the Governors however lost faith in him.Governor Gore Brown it seems was determined to force the issue of who controlled the country. When Teira offered him land at Waitara it seemed a golden opportunity to show the power of Britain. Unfortnately Teira had only a minor claim to the area. Wiremu Kingi (te Atiawa) had a stronger claim and so did the Waikato who had driven the Te Atiawa off the land during the Musket Wars.When the war broke out the British and settlers found themselves surrounded and penned into New Plymouth. The ring of modern Pa which encircled the town became a challenge which first Colonel Gold then General Pratt unsuccessfully attacked with cannon then sap.Neither seemed to appreciate the tactic that kept them occupied with relatively unimportant military targets. The war meandered along with the Maori out-digging the Imperial Troops.
The involvement of Kingitanga warriors appeared to confirm the Pakeha belief that the King intended to enforce a Land League and to stand in the way of British law by stopping the sale by Teira of the Waitara. The challenge to the rule of law seems to have been a Government preoccupation, as many settlers recognised the weakness of Teiras claim to the land.The end of the war was claimed as victory by the returning Grey although his failure to punish the ‘rebels’ seems to indicate the weak case that they had and their inability to defeat an enemy who would not stay still. As it happens Grey believed he needed to strike at the heart of Maori resistance – the King in the Waikato
Wednesday, 4 May 2011
Flour and Sugar
(New 2011) In class we talked about Grey's policies after the 1840 conflicts. Having secured peace in the North and subdued the South he set about acquiring land, lots of land. With the help of McLean he purchased 33,000,000 acres (about half the country) almost all of the South island and a tenth of the North. Much of this was accomplished under the 'Flour & Sugar' policy. McLean used Hui to negotiate the sales of land, often exploiting tribal issues to encourage the dispossession of Maori from their land. Korero was often aided by the gifts which flowed to the Chiefs. From http://lossenelin.livejournal.com/99938.html
"Settlers were dependent on Maori for markets, primary production, and coastal and river transport while Maori were dependent on the settlers for trade. By the 1850s Maori consumed an estimated £500,000 worth of imported European goods per year, and this want for European goods was a likely motivator for land sales, which were the easiest source of cash for Maori, although they were involved in many other economic ventures, and often working for wages in the Pakeha economy. Others sold land for different reasons; to attract Pakeha to Maori areas for trade, to meet debts and to gain capital either for the development of remaining land or for arms and ammunition.
From a Pakeha perspective the trade that occurred between the two groups was largely done for the benefit of settlement, for instance Governor George Grey's 'flour and sugar' policy of aid and education to Maori was focused on areas where he hoped to get land. In this pre-taxation era state funds were partly derived from profits on land transactions. Grey justified land deals where the Crown resold land at a profit on the basis that the real payment would be long term Maori prosperity, but in practice it was a mechanism for dispossession. Land sales also had the effect of allowing Maori entrepreneurs to emerge, using profit from land sales for themselves rather than their kin groups".
Increasingly the loss of land began to concern Maori, especially those who were aware of the impact on other indigenous peoples caused by land loss.
the 1840's fightback.
Te Rangihaeta was outraged by the lack of tikanga practised in Wellington. Ngatitoa had always been the the pre-eminent Iwi in the region. Under the leadership of Te Rauapraha they had travelled south from Kawhia taking Ngati Mutunga and Te Atiawa under their protectorship. In uti for their support alnong the way, they gifted them (the right to occupy) land in Wellington and the Hutt valley.
He supported the fighting in the Hutt, even when he did recieve some comprensation, but found he was battling not only Grey but also some of his own Iwi who resented his presence and his interference. Greys fait accompli against Te Rauparaha diminished Ngatitoa mana and ability to fight. Grey then forced almost all Maori out of the Wellington area despite an agreement to allow retention of gardens and sacred grounds. With little support and facing Redcoats not Settlers, Rangihaeta was forced out of area and into Porirua. Building a fighting Pa away from the coast to negate the British gunboats only slowed the ineveitable and Rangihaeta was forced to abandon his claims in the region. Grey appeared to be beating the Maori and was feted by Settlers.
Te Mamaku had supported Rangihaeta and withdrew back to his Iwi near Petre (Wanganui) when Wellington was lost. He raised some problems for settlers resulting in the killing of a settler family. Local Maori were angry at his interference and the possibility that they might loose 'their' Pakeha. They chased down the murderers and handed them over to the Settler administration. Te Mamaku fought the Army at St Johns Wood near Wanganui in an indecisive battle but abandoned his campaign bcaause of a lack of support. Like Rangihaeta he also retired into the hinterland. Grey chose to retain his new found reputation by not chasing either into the interior.
Maori land ownership is difficult to quantify but conquest and occupancy gave Ngatitoa rights over the land. Ngati Mutunga transferred that land to other hapu when they left the Hutt for the Chathams. Ngatitoa retained its Rangatiratanga. When this land was 'sold' to settlers Te Rangiaheata expected recompense as required by tikanga, but initially received nothing. When problems developed between Settlers and Maori in the area he travelled north to support their (and his own) claims.
He supported the fighting in the Hutt, even when he did recieve some comprensation, but found he was battling not only Grey but also some of his own Iwi who resented his presence and his interference. Greys fait accompli against Te Rauparaha diminished Ngatitoa mana and ability to fight. Grey then forced almost all Maori out of the Wellington area despite an agreement to allow retention of gardens and sacred grounds. With little support and facing Redcoats not Settlers, Rangihaeta was forced out of area and into Porirua. Building a fighting Pa away from the coast to negate the British gunboats only slowed the ineveitable and Rangihaeta was forced to abandon his claims in the region. Grey appeared to be beating the Maori and was feted by Settlers.
Te Mamaku had supported Rangihaeta and withdrew back to his Iwi near Petre (Wanganui) when Wellington was lost. He raised some problems for settlers resulting in the killing of a settler family. Local Maori were angry at his interference and the possibility that they might loose 'their' Pakeha. They chased down the murderers and handed them over to the Settler administration. Te Mamaku fought the Army at St Johns Wood near Wanganui in an indecisive battle but abandoned his campaign bcaause of a lack of support. Like Rangihaeta he also retired into the hinterland. Grey chose to retain his new found reputation by not chasing either into the interior.Wednesday, 20 April 2011
Prezi Test - a work in progress.
Wait for it to load and then click on the arrow. Best in full screen. Comments are welcome.
Monday, 11 April 2011
Happy Birthday Welly High
The 13th of April 2011 is the 125th anniversary of the school.125 years since a young (25) Artur Dewhurst Riley opened a new school offering subjects not available in the traditional schools... some things just never change.
Latin and Greek designed to send young men to University were replaced with a new curriculum offering classes in Art and training in more useful subjects allowed students to consider other careers.
Even more importantly classes were offered to young women and co-educational classes were introduced.
Incident, Affray or Massacre?
New 2011. I don;t know why I haven't written this entry before.
After the Treaty signing Hobson quickly made two announcements. The first was used to forestall the claims of the New Zealand Company. Recently arrived in Wellington and busy negotiating their purchase there, the Company represented a threat to the Crown. If their purchases went through then this would present a threat to the Crowns ability to dominate the trade in land.
Using the treaty as a validation of British authority he claimed the North Island by right of cessation. Basically he was claiming Rangatiratanga over the whole island based on the 35 Nga Puhi signatories.
Secondly he chose to beat any potential French claims to with the new settlement at Akaroa. He claimed the South Island by right of 'discovery'... conveniently ignoring the fact that Tasman had beaten Cook by over a century.
From about this point Hobson and the Settlers simply assumed that New Zealand was now a British possession. By the start of 1841, 500 chiefs had signed and seemed to confirm this view. Unfortunately someone forgot to tell everyone about the new state of affiars.
Meanwhile almost every few weeks a new ship arrived from Britain with even more new settlers.
By 1843 settlements like Nelson and New Plymouth were bursting. The available land was allocated and there was a serious shortage of the promised farms. To make things worse the Government was proving a tough negotiator. After the treaty all previous land claims had to be confirmed. Its representative Spain was quite generous allowing the New Plymouth settlement to claim several tens of thousands of acres, which the Governor promptly cut down to 4500 acres.
The New Zealand Company claims in the south island were even more tenuous. This left the Nelson settlers nervous. They still retained a claim to the fertile Wairau valley. When they pushed through with this claim the local Maori appealed to their protector, Te Rauparaha. He in turn called upon the Governor to setle the dispute and a promise was made to send Commissioner Spain. In an effort to force their claim the Settlers sent surveyors to the Wairau to start the process. Te Rauparaha, now resident in the area authorised the pulling of their pegs and when this did not deter them the burning of their whare.
Enraged the settlers demanded the arrest of the culprit, and Magistrate Thompson issued an arrest warrant for arson. The ill prepared and armed posse arrived and in an incident described at different times as a massacre, and affray and later an incident 22 Europeans died. 17 were executed by Te Rauparaha's ally Rangihaeata. ( in utu for the death of his wife Rongo).
Settlers were angry and demanded retaliation. Fitzroy's inquiry chose to blame the settlers including the dead Arthur Wakefield and Magistrate Thompson for the incident. The Settler claim to the Wairau was considered to be false thus the charge of arson was wrong. Maori had simply been defending their lands and themselves.
That was the legal reality. What is important is that even if Fitroy had wanted to he did not have the means to attack the Ngati Toa and their allies. There were thousands of heavily armed warriors in the country and he lacked the military ability to deal with them. For the moment New Zealand was still a Maori country with numerous European enclaves.
After the Treaty signing Hobson quickly made two announcements. The first was used to forestall the claims of the New Zealand Company. Recently arrived in Wellington and busy negotiating their purchase there, the Company represented a threat to the Crown. If their purchases went through then this would present a threat to the Crowns ability to dominate the trade in land.
Using the treaty as a validation of British authority he claimed the North Island by right of cessation. Basically he was claiming Rangatiratanga over the whole island based on the 35 Nga Puhi signatories.
Secondly he chose to beat any potential French claims to with the new settlement at Akaroa. He claimed the South Island by right of 'discovery'... conveniently ignoring the fact that Tasman had beaten Cook by over a century.
From about this point Hobson and the Settlers simply assumed that New Zealand was now a British possession. By the start of 1841, 500 chiefs had signed and seemed to confirm this view. Unfortunately someone forgot to tell everyone about the new state of affiars.
Meanwhile almost every few weeks a new ship arrived from Britain with even more new settlers.
By 1843 settlements like Nelson and New Plymouth were bursting. The available land was allocated and there was a serious shortage of the promised farms. To make things worse the Government was proving a tough negotiator. After the treaty all previous land claims had to be confirmed. Its representative Spain was quite generous allowing the New Plymouth settlement to claim several tens of thousands of acres, which the Governor promptly cut down to 4500 acres.The New Zealand Company claims in the south island were even more tenuous. This left the Nelson settlers nervous. They still retained a claim to the fertile Wairau valley. When they pushed through with this claim the local Maori appealed to their protector, Te Rauparaha. He in turn called upon the Governor to setle the dispute and a promise was made to send Commissioner Spain. In an effort to force their claim the Settlers sent surveyors to the Wairau to start the process. Te Rauparaha, now resident in the area authorised the pulling of their pegs and when this did not deter them the burning of their whare.
Enraged the settlers demanded the arrest of the culprit, and Magistrate Thompson issued an arrest warrant for arson. The ill prepared and armed posse arrived and in an incident described at different times as a massacre, and affray and later an incident 22 Europeans died. 17 were executed by Te Rauparaha's ally Rangihaeata. ( in utu for the death of his wife Rongo).
Settlers were angry and demanded retaliation. Fitzroy's inquiry chose to blame the settlers including the dead Arthur Wakefield and Magistrate Thompson for the incident. The Settler claim to the Wairau was considered to be false thus the charge of arson was wrong. Maori had simply been defending their lands and themselves. That was the legal reality. What is important is that even if Fitroy had wanted to he did not have the means to attack the Ngati Toa and their allies. There were thousands of heavily armed warriors in the country and he lacked the military ability to deal with them. For the moment New Zealand was still a Maori country with numerous European enclaves.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
